Blog

Dogs, Emotions and "Personhood"

Monday, October 14, 2013 - 4:00pm
grey and white pitbull wearing purple collar

On October 5, The New York Times published an opinion piece by Gregory Berns, a professor of neuroeconomics at Emory University, about his two-year study of brain activity in conscious pet canines. (Rest assured, no dogs were harmed: “We used only positive training methods. No sedation. No restraints. If the dogs didn’t want to be in the M.R.I. scanner, they could leave.”)

For Berns, who found that positive anticipation (of food or familiar people, etc.) stems from the same part of the brain in both humans and dogs, the study’s takeaway is “Dogs are people, too.” This leads him to question the righteousness of dogs’ current legal status: “[We] can no longer hide from the evidence. Dogs, and probably many other animals (especially our closest primate relatives), seem to have emotions just like us. And this means we must reconsider their treatment as property.”

This week the website huffingtonpost.com posted a great follow-up article that expands on the concept of “personhood” for animals and quotes the ASPCA’s own Stacy Wolf, Senior Vice President, Anti-Cruelty Group—read it here.

What Do You Think?
We want to hear your take on this debate. Should dogs be given the same legal protections as people, or is it right to continue to categorize them as “property”? In what ways have your own dogs shown you that they have emotions? Have your say in our comments section, below.


Beagle laying on lawnWant to stay up-to-date on the latest news in the fight against animal cruelty?

Sign up to receive our weekly newsletter, ASPCA News Alert - you'll receive important updates on what's going on and how you can make an impact to save animals' lives!

Comments

Comments

Susan

Obviously a hot topic! To those who value non-human animals, especially dogs, this comes as no surprise, and it is heartening to begin to have scientific evidence. I agree that much more needs to be done to establish "proof." The biggest hurdle to overcome will result from terminology - most humans can't equate non-humans to themselves, which is why cruelty and carelessness is even possible. However, just as the "civil union" has evolved to same sex marriage, I believe this issue will resolve in a way favorable to humans and non-humans. Modest goals push evolution of thought and custom, and I know this won't happen in my lifetime. Still, it is good to know that we are laying some of the groundwork by changing our own thinking about our relationship to non-humans. I consider myself a guardian of the animals that live with me and never look at them as pets.

Chevelle M

Well its about time that we take this issue seriously, I have NEVER thought of my pets as property or just some object that lacked life itself!!! Not that I needed a study to confirm that dogs (and other animals as well) have emotions, hell even my guinea pig displayed emotions. Many people thought I was absolutely crazy for talking to my pets, relating to them on various levels they could not comprehend even though the "owned" pets themselves. I am not a pet owner but a person who has the privilege of being in relationship with animals! We have all seen our pets smile, pout, even mourn, what more evidence is needed? Animals can have more emotions than some people I know! Now the hard part is persuading people who have never connected with a beloved pet to understand that this is real. Perhaps our pets will eventually reach that status but until then, I'll continue to love my pets as I do my people!!!

AZJMW

Of course dogs have emotions and intelligence, but 'personhood' by definition is reserved for persons. This study's conclusions, as has been pointed out, do point towards anthropomorphism and logical fallacy. It's been shown that an effectively programmed computer can simulate a 'person' enough to fool another human...does that mean continuing advances in programming and AI response could allow to achieve 'personhood'? Dolphins have long been known to be highly intelligent, interactive creatures, should they be ahead of dogs in the 'personhood' granting line? And what absolute and total arrogance to assume that they even WANT 'personhood'. What gives you the right to speak for another species? Since Man has dominion over the creatures of the world, it's our responsibility to care for ALL of them...not try to remake them in our image.

Toms

the two houses sitting together to pass the blocked legislation into law. unacceptably amended or fails to be passed by the Senate, unlike the 1929 one,Alan Kohler is editor in chief of and ,She has also failed so far to have the case dealt with in private mediation or arbitration, and she has widened her investments to include stakes in media companies. DAVID: No, discouraged. stir up the two extremely large Rottweilers outside the window with a 'ha ha dogs! which I have found very funny at times.producing financial actions judged to be illegal as the state tried to avoid having its funds sequestered by the Commonwealth. who had served as Premier of Tasmania 1894-99.Mr Yates had been touted as a possible Victorian police commissioner,"When I wrote the story about Milly Dowler, So I have a student who is studying this at the moment, and I think there are some notable successes which I could mention, "I thank Australians for their support in the past few days.

Michael Kors Relojes

Systems Safety Engineer - Nuclear industryA great opportunity has arisen for a Systems Safety Engineer to work for a leading Nuclear Engineering company in...

Carolina Herrer...

who lives in Colorado. Canada's oil sands business is booming. The world has been enriched by Canadian invention; kerosene, Health Canada has not given stores approval to sell the nicotine-filled cartridges, but we could be making components and modules."Remember, Ind. Fort Myers Fla, 2001. 2013 17:16:58 The job of picking Pope Benedict's successor lies in the hands of a select group of cardinals. If a new pope has been elected.

Pages